<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NY Times: &#8220;Do We Need a New Internet?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.evanmix.com/2009/02/15/ny-times-do-we-need-a-new-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.evanmix.com/2009/02/15/ny-times-do-we-need-a-new-internet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:57:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.evanmix.com/2009/02/15/ny-times-do-we-need-a-new-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 01:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evanmix.com/?p=508#comment-498</guid>
		<description>Your point is well taken. Better programming can, and should, be a priority. On the other hand, by the nature of the process, there will probably always be more bad programmers out there releasing stuff than good ones. A lot of the biggest security problems arise from major companies like Microsoft, and if they can&#039;t even release secure stuff, who else can? Not that I think a &quot;new Internet&quot; is the answer either.

&lt;i&gt;For reference, the report in question (from the SANS Institute) is available &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sans.org/top25errors/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and an interview with the guy behind it is available &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.entrepreneur.com/2009/01/top-25-programming-errors-that-compromise-computer-software-security.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your point is well taken. Better programming can, and should, be a priority. On the other hand, by the nature of the process, there will probably always be more bad programmers out there releasing stuff than good ones. A lot of the biggest security problems arise from major companies like Microsoft, and if they can&#8217;t even release secure stuff, who else can? Not that I think a &#8220;new Internet&#8221; is the answer either.</p>
<p><i>For reference, the report in question (from the SANS Institute) is available <a href="http://www.sans.org/top25errors/">here</a>, and an interview with the guy behind it is available <a href="http://blog.entrepreneur.com/2009/01/top-25-programming-errors-that-compromise-computer-software-security.php">here</a>.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kymlee</title>
		<link>http://www.evanmix.com/2009/02/15/ny-times-do-we-need-a-new-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>kymlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 01:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evanmix.com/?p=508#comment-497</guid>
		<description>I read a tech report recently that basically attributed most security breaches to 25 programming errors. Maybe instead of starting over, programmers could begin correcting those mistakes and building better software. Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read a tech report recently that basically attributed most security breaches to 25 programming errors. Maybe instead of starting over, programmers could begin correcting those mistakes and building better software. Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

