<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Most Obvious iTunes Feature Request Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.evanmix.com/2009/03/23/the-most-obvious-itunes-feature-request-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.evanmix.com/2009/03/23/the-most-obvious-itunes-feature-request-ever/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:57:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://www.evanmix.com/2009/03/23/the-most-obvious-itunes-feature-request-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evanmix.com/?p=719#comment-744</guid>
		<description>Thank you! I thought I was the only person being driven crazy by this!!! It&#039;s such a simple approach and absolutely needed. Especially in this age when guest features are so commonplace! I found this page after googling for a solution to this issue for the past 2 hours!

Argh! So frustrating! Apple, if you&#039;re going to tie the universe to using iTunes, the least you can do is to provide advanced metadata handling capabilities. I would dump itunes YESTERDAY were it not for the fact that all of my iphone apps have to be downloaded through the thing (again, why?!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you! I thought I was the only person being driven crazy by this!!! It&#8217;s such a simple approach and absolutely needed. Especially in this age when guest features are so commonplace! I found this page after googling for a solution to this issue for the past 2 hours!</p>
<p>Argh! So frustrating! Apple, if you&#8217;re going to tie the universe to using iTunes, the least you can do is to provide advanced metadata handling capabilities. I would dump itunes YESTERDAY were it not for the fact that all of my iphone apps have to be downloaded through the thing (again, why?!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ta5ae</title>
		<link>http://www.evanmix.com/2009/03/23/the-most-obvious-itunes-feature-request-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>ta5ae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 17:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evanmix.com/?p=719#comment-736</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-735&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@ta5ae:&lt;/a&gt;  missed even</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-735">@ta5ae:</a>  missed even</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ta5ae</title>
		<link>http://www.evanmix.com/2009/03/23/the-most-obvious-itunes-feature-request-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>ta5ae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 16:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evanmix.com/?p=719#comment-735</guid>
		<description>I tend to use the search function instead.  Sure it would find tracks with that name but at least no music would be mixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to use the search function instead.  Sure it would find tracks with that name but at least no music would be mixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitin</title>
		<link>http://www.evanmix.com/2009/03/23/the-most-obvious-itunes-feature-request-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evanmix.com/?p=719#comment-637</guid>
		<description>I concur.  iTunes seems to rely heavily on this antiquated &quot;playlist&quot; notion (this becomes especially acute with the iPods), when tags would do the same work and a hell of a lot more.  Even Teh Google seems to be coming around to the idea that the Omnibox cannot solve all of our problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur.  iTunes seems to rely heavily on this antiquated &#8220;playlist&#8221; notion (this becomes especially acute with the iPods), when tags would do the same work and a hell of a lot more.  Even Teh Google seems to be coming around to the idea that the Omnibox cannot solve all of our problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

